Free download:

Software Wars, the Movie

Soundtrack for the book:

If you enjoyed the free download, a donation of the cost of a newspaper would be appreciated.

The best book explaining free market economics:

The best explanation of how we can build a space elevator in 10 years:

Book explaining a political solution to our economic problems:

Letter to the FDA About Chlorine Dioxide

Dear FDA,

Your web page about Chlorine Dioxide has multiple mistakes:

It is not the same as bleach because it is a milder oxidizer. It’s been shown that it won’t oxidize body cells or gut bacteria, but it will oxidize many pathogens like viruses that are weakly held together. There are testimonials for it treating everything from cancer to HIV. I’ve read that 20 million people worldwide have taken the medicine, and that it has treated Covid-19! If your web page was actually correct, that couldn’t have happened.

Also, the process of oxidation with bleach produces unwanted chlorinated hydrocarbons such as chloroform. ClO2, on the other hand, oxidizes without adding an atom of its own. To compare it to bleach is a lie!

The lethal dose of Chlorine Dioxide is very high, whereas the typical protocol is 3-6 drops of MMS in 1/2 cup of water per hour. There is zero chance of dehydration or other problems at reasonable doses.

Here’s a link to more information:

Highly-rated Chlorine Dioxide mouthwash and water treatment

FDA Response

Thank you for writing the Division of Drug Information in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.

We appreciate you taking the time to share your information with us. 

We appreciate your effort in contacting the FDA to share your concerns with us. As discussed in the FDA News Release on Miracle Mineral Solution, the FDA warns consumers not to purchase or drink products such as Mineral Solution, Miracle Mineral Supplement, MMS, Chlorine Dioxide Protocol, Water Purification Solution, or other similar products do to serious and potentially life-threatening side effects. These products are not FDA-approved for treating COVID-19.

Please find up-to-date information on the FDA Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Main Page and the CDC COVID-19 Main Page.

Reply to FDA

Dear FDA,

Thank you very much for responding to me! Unfortunately, I believe some of your information is incorrect.

I know you all are doing your best, but I find it a little ironic you are trying to outlaw a medicine that treats (via oxidation) half the diseases known to man, including Covid-19: It’s been used for 100 years in medicine. It’s known to work well as a mouthwash. People using it have no plaque build up because it oxidizes the bacteria which create it.

Chlorine Dioxide won’t touch body tissue or even gut bacteria, but it will rip apart a virus like Covid-19. Here’s an article talking about it treating all the Covid-19 patients in one city in Bolivia:

It’s not in English, but it’s worth translating given the stunning results. If you really believe Chlorine Dioxide doesn’t work, you would be able to explain alternate theories for that result. It would be great for someone to try at least, and put that on the FDA web page.

If you don’t think Chlorine Dioxide is a good selective oxidizer, then what safe oxidizers do you recommend? You could enhance the Chlorine Dioxide page by telling everyone to use something even better. How come you don’t mention any replacements using this powerful and underutilized mechanism of action?

The dangerous side effects seem only when inhaled, or ingesting far outside the recommended dose. It would be like eating 2 cups of salt. How can you say something that is currently used in mouthwash and water treatment to be unsafe without talking about the dose? It’s safer than the Chlorine water in swimming pools.

The typical dose is just a few drops in 1/2 cup per hour. It’s been said it breaks down into salts and oxygen, or have you heard something else?

A US Army veteran told me it saved his life when he caught malaria. I have heard it’s quite widely used in US military hospitals. Can you investigate that?

There’s a lot of great scientific information on this page explaining about how it can be used for Covid-19: Do you see any mistakes?

The Chlorine Dioxide page on the FDA website has zero scientific studies it links to! How can you be so certain that page is correct with nothing to back it up?

The government spends a lot of time and money on vaccines. However, which is easier for the body to accomplish:

  1. To build immunity and neutralize all Covid-19 particles faster than a lab-made virus can replicate.
  2. Drink a potion which selectively oxidizes all the virus particles.

I’ve also read that Chlorine Dioxide is enhanced by Dimethyl Sulfate, a solvent which dissolves the ClO2 so that it can be carried into cells and deeper into the body. Maybe you should fund some studies along the lines of mild oxidants, and solvents for them, if you don’t have any good information right now.

Please read through the pages of testimonials and consider the possibility that you are wrong: what would happen to the drug industry if this could treat half of the most common diseases known to man?

If you could try to respond to even a few of these questions, I would really appreciate it!

I put this quote in my book, and I believe it applies to the FDA regarding Chlorine Dioxide:

Brilliance is typically the act of an individual, but incredible stupidity can usually be traced to an organization.

—Jon Bentley

3 comments to Letter to the FDA About Chlorine Dioxide

  • Harsimran Singh

    Hi Keith,

    You wrote “Chlorine Dioxide is positively charged and also a mild oxidizer, which makes it very selective.” Actually, that is an incorrect statement. Being Positively Charged and a Mild Oxidizer does not make it selective. Rather, selectivity of ClO2 between humans and bacteria is based not on their different biochemistry, but on their different size. Finally, Chlorine Dioxide is not a mild oxidizer. It is a strong oxidizer.

    Chlorine dioxide is a size selective antimicrobial agent which can kill micron sized organisms rapidly but cannot make real harm to much larger organisms like animals or humans as it is not able to penetrate deeply into their living tissues.

    Further, the disinfection of living tissues with aqueous ClO2 solutions has a very wide therapeutic window: while surprisingly low concentrations and short contact times are able to kill bacteria, much higher concentrations and residence times are still safe to use. Which cannot be said for other disinfections in use today within the medical field, in dentistry for example, where they use Hydrogen Peroxide or even Ozone therapies.

    As for the protocols used by people orally taking aqueous ClO2, they are taking it in very safe dosages, far from any dosage that would remotely link it to being toxic. There is one notable exception: inhaling high concentration ClO2 gases for an extended time can be dangerous for human health because the alveolar membrane is extremely thin (a mere 1-2 microns and in some places even below 1 micron). The effect of ClO2 in these membranes is somewhat counterbalanced, however, by the intense blood circulation there.

    Read more in the published Medical Journal.

    While the above article does not link to the toxicity of oral ingestion in man, here is one that does talk about it, from 1982. Controlled clinical evaluations of chlorine dioxide, chlorite and chlorate in man.. At this point. It is a coverup by the Mainstream Media, Far Left Organizations and controlled Democrat-led employees in the FDA.

    From the study: “No definitive finding of detrimental physiological impact was made in any of the three phases of this human investigation of the relative safety and tolerance of oral chlorine disinfectant ingestion. In several cases, statistically significant trends were associated with treatment; however, none of these trends were judged to have immediate physiological consequence.

    One cannot rule out the possibility that, over a longer treatment period, these trends might indeed achieve proportions of clinical importance. However, within the limits of the study, the relative safety of oral ingestion of chlorine dioxide and its metabolites, chlorite and chlorate, was demonstrated by the absence of detrimental physiological response.”

    • Thanks for replying!

      I will go through your notes more. However, I disagree Chlorine Dioxide is a strong oxidizer, at least compared to things like Ozone or hydrogen peroxide. Those oxidize everything they run into, whereas Chlorine Dioxide will travel all around the body and bloodstream until it runs into something negatively charged and weakly held together like a virus, and oxidize it. It’s selective since it doesn’t oxidize everything, only pathogens.

      I tweaked the words based on your feedback. Thanks!

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>